Search for: "Victory v. State" Results 6441 - 6460 of 6,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The New York Times ran a front page story, stating that Thorpe “was a magnificent performer. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
 From the Land of the Glens comes the judgment of the Glennie in the form of Schuh Limited v Shhh... [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Michael Z. Green
One decision from this past term—Starbucks v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:09 pm by Amy Howe
Indeed, Cruz notes, 40 states and the District of Columbia do not impose any restrictions on the use of post-election contributions to repay candidate loans in state-level elections. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:05 am by Robin E. Shea
The plaintiff in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
At the first tentative sign of a disfavored move—say, for instance, a retreat from Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 7:11 am
Other acts of constitutional hardball, like the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Vicarious liability in the Supreme Court On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:54 am by Ashley Moye
Examples are drawn from research problems that became evident in Abbott v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]