Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
The Oklahoma law sought to limit the drug’s use to the protocol described on FDA-approved drug labels (i.e., no later than forty-nine days’ gestation), cutting back on existing “off-label” prescription by doctors up to sixty-three days’ gestation. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:33 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:08 am
See Berger v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
(Equilon Enterprises v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
As the Ninth Circuit reasoned in Toyota Motor Sales v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 1:44 pm
See Gelmas v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:44 am
Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:34 am
” Metzler Investment GMBH v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:34 am
” Metzler Investment GMBH v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm
The case, known as Delaware v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:25 am
Specifically, in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:57 am
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 11:16 am
Facts of Intellectual Ventures v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
Following a long line of authority including Nikken v Pioneer [2005] and Nokia v IPCom [2011], Floyd LJ held that it was necessary to distinguish between pre-trial applications to amend and post-trial deletions on the one hand, and post-trial validating amendments by re-writing the claims on the other. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 3:41 am
Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010 (1996); Schorsch v Moses & Singer, L.L.P., 60 AD3d 557, 557 (1st Dept 2009). [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:50 am
Lazar v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” Additional coverage of the solicitor general’s motion in United States v. [read post]
