Search for: "People v. House"
Results 6461 - 6480
of 12,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am
(R.A.V. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
After Dillon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:09 am
The ACLJ is planning to file an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
For the very sensible reasons explained by the Supreme Court of the United States in Powell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Bruen and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:43 am
Barron v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am
”After these continued threats and out of concern for her animals and her daughter, our client finally relented and "consented" to the deputies request to enter her home.The deputies proceeded to search the entire home and allegedly found drug paraphernalia, marijuana seeds, a couple of old marijuana roaches, and rolling papers.Only after searching the entire house did the officers request that our client sign a consent form. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:14 am
Both the Matlock and Randolph cases were about the search of real property, specifically a home shared by two people. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Just so you get an appreciation for how much work is going on up at the court – and exactly how many people are convicted under the Armed Career Criminal Act – here is a list of those cases: Klikno v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
Government has no affirmative duty to help protect people. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Massey Housing America’s Native People Wendy L. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am
During the earlier stages of the impeachment inquiry, Bolton informed the House committees conducting the impeachment inquiry that he would not comply with a subpoena if one were issued because the White House had determined he was absolutely immune from such testimony and had directed him not to comply. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:48 am
In the app store context, the Pepper v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:21 am
See Nken v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Article V of the Constitution lays out two mechanisms for amendment. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Under Addington v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm
Statements of President Obama made today (June 22, 2012) in celebration of the 13th anniversary of the June 22, 1999 Supreme Court decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
These sound like business decisions: promotional value v. backlash. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:33 am
Meregildo, supra.In ruling on the motion, the district court judge who has the case explained that the 4th Amendment guarantees thatthe people shall be `secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
