Search for: "Strong v. Strong" Results 6461 - 6480 of 19,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
 The Sixth Circuit further stated that the 2006 Act is designed to protect trademarks from any unfavorable sexual associations, and any new mark with a lewd or offensive-to-some sexual association raises a strong inference of tarnishment. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
Third, there should be no presumptions (or at least no “strong” presumptions) about what it was reasonable to expect a family member to do: the question is whether an applicant will in fact receive support, to be determined on the evidence ([70]). [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 6:36 am by INFORRM
And it sends a strong message to purveyors of disinformation – on social media and otherwise. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Caroline Gentry
Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wal-Mart’s appeal of the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision upholding the certification of a class action gender discrimination lawsuit in Dukes v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:54 am
Following the discussion of Molineux, the use of prior bad act evidence against a defendant at trial, Gideon at A Public Defender posted an exceptional discussion of the Connecticut Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 5:46 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm by LindaMBeale
Statements in the record certainly suggest a strong element of animus towards gays at the time of passage of DOMA. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm by Joshua Sellers
This background helps explain the widespread condemnation that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:21 am by Big Tent Democrat
" Mexico off to a strong start looking dangerous from the first minute. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:10 am by Charles Sartain
Posted by Charles SartainCo-author Brooke Sizer J-W Operating Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:07 pm
But it is an endlessly fascinating time for intermediary lawyers...Anyway just a note that people seem to think that Google has won the first round, not against Viacom itself but in Tur v YouTube, an earlier launched case. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:31 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York: Casillas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:24 am by Kevin
Something seems very wrong here, because the report is that the Supreme Court has unanimously held in Riley v. [read post]