Search for: "Williams v. State" Results 6461 - 6480 of 13,448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
  PPL and the United States (which has filed a brief on the merits supporting PPL) rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am by Michael Kimberly
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees than just the First Amend­ment. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
To state a prima facie case of employment discrimination due to a disability, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she suffered from a disability and that the disability caused the behavior for which he or she was terminated (Matter of McEniry v Landi, 84 NY2d 554). [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:01 pm by scottgaille
This is a guest blog authored by William Brumfield, an Associate at GAILLE PLLC. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87), the complaint herein sufficiently alleges a cause of action in negligence against the SLS defendants and the SLS employees (see Rivera v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, 191 F Supp 2d at 421; see also Williams v State of New York, 84 AD3d 412). [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 7:55 pm
He made the point that in his view there has never been a US Supreme Court opinion that has been more ignored and defied than State Farm v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
At that time, Circuit Judges William Norris and William Canby voted to subject the military policy to heightened scrutiny, while Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt, agreeing in principle, dissented because he found that the Supreme Court's 1986 Georgia sodomy ruling, Bowers v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp writes that although “[t]he Supreme Court took a step in the right direction [last] week when it held [in Comcast v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm by Thomas Hopson
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]