Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 6481 - 6500 of 21,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2012, 11:26 pm by Robert B. Milligan
The Act is intended to strengthen the scope of the Economic Espionage Act to prevent results like the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:26 pm by Robert B. Milligan
The Act is intended to strengthen the scope of the Economic Espionage Act to prevent results like the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 12:26 pm by Viking
Article I, section 9 of the United States Constitution states in relevant part that “[n]o Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed,” and, in its opinion in Calder v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:56 am by Bruce Thomas
  The Washington, DC gun control case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:21 am
Although Education Law Section 3020-a 3 c(iii)(C) states that an administrator or teacher has the right to demand a "bill of particulars" concerning the charges and specifications filed against him or her, no similar provision is included in Section 75 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 12:30 am
Last Act: 02/01/10 REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO CODESS6724 ADDABBO -- Relates to permitting all state-paid uniformed court officers to execute bench warrants Same as A 602 BLURB : CP L. bench warrants; ct officersLast Act: 02/01/10 REFERRED TO CODESLast Action Date: 02/02/10(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
In fact, in September of 2012, the New Hampshire Speaker of the House Bill O’Brien described the language as necessary because college students were “[v]oting as a liberal. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:27 am by John Lewis
Posted by John LewisIn the wake of the Supreme Court’s April 27th decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:09 am
The New York Times reports that Democrats in Congress have introduced a bill to undo the Court ruling last June in Gross v. [read post]
The bill states that the rules remain the same as they have been since 1993 (as expressly embraced by the Industrial Welfare Commission in 2000). [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:30 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States Department of the Interior (Gaming; Administrative Procedures Act)Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
  He relied on the English decision in Woodward v Hutchins ([1977] 1 WLR 760). [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Faleomavaega Panel 7 — Policing Violence against Indian Women — Sarah Deer, Christi Belcourt, Sam Hirsch Panel 8 — Tribes, States, and Taxes — Gabriel Galanda, Shana Barehand, Mary Streitz Break-out Panel 1 — United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Dept. of the Interior (Land into Trust)Navajo Nation v. [read post]