Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 33,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2020, 5:41 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 ruled unanimously in the case of Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:15 pm
Our letter also highlights EFF’s successful advocacy with the California Attorney General’s Office to classify immigration enforcement as a form of misuse of the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS). [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:59 am
Shutterfly argued that the McGill rule only applied to claims arising under California’s consumer protection laws, and that the plaintiff in this case was not seeking a public injunction, but a private one. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:49 am
Full text: Sarrouf Law LLP v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:36 pm
(Note that some states, including Alaska, California, New Mexico, and Pennsylvania do not allow this calculation under state law.) [read post]
20 May 2020, 11:48 am
” For the full petition in Voss v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
There's only a single published opinion from the Ninth Circuit and California appellate courts today. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
California, 19-532Issue: Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of aliens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity. [read post]
19 May 2020, 12:35 pm
On April 30, 2020, the California Supreme Court (“Court”) ruled on April 30, 2020 that claims brought pursuant to California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and the False Advertising Law (“FAL”) are not entitled to a jury trial. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966). [read post]
18 May 2020, 5:03 pm
” Switzer v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:40 pm
California (Stetson Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2020) on SSRN. [read post]
18 May 2020, 12:00 pm
Last week the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in Yowell v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:54 am
Plaintiffs brought claims under the Wiretap Act, Stored Communications Act, the California privacy statute, the common law, as well as contract, warranty, and UCL claims. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
That is, even as Republicans have largely won their decades-long war against labor unions in the private sector (allowing most private companies to quickly drop their pension plans), the public sector is the one remaining stronghold of workers’ power.This issue arose in 2018’s Janus v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
On the same day Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Notting Hill Genesis v Ali. [read post]
17 May 2020, 10:13 am
(Spoiler alert: not a happy ending, this time).United States v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 8:32 pm
Additional Resources: Earth Science Tech, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:19 am
Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. [read post]
