Search for: "High v State" Results 6481 - 6500 of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm by Giles Peaker
While the provision considered is effectively the same, there is a distinction made in terms of justification of policy which may be significant.It is a reasoned decision based on Article 14, distinguishing MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Ors [2013] EWHC 2213 (QB). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:47 am by Adam Santucci
On June 17, 2010 the United States Supreme Court issued the highly anticipated decision City of Ontario v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:33 am by Richard Hunt
ADA standing – aiming to high leads to a crash and burn. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
However, Arnold J held that the consent was neither informed nor voluntary: Mr Ali was drowsy, confused and not in a fit state to give consent for the first hour of the programme. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am by Aleksandra Czubek
  - shared a perspective on the recent High Court decision in Ensygnia v Shell ([2023] EWHC 1495 (Pat)) considering it highly relevant to the ongoing controversy of claim interpretation and description amendments. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:42 am by Gene Quinn
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) sent a memo to the Examining Corps with information and instructions relating to the recent ruling in Enfish, LLC v. [read post]