Search for: "State v. L. A. T." Results 6481 - 6500 of 9,948
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
“[L]oss of at-will employment,” the Court held, may be treated as “injur[ing]” a person “in his person or property,” even though at-will employment isn’t technically a “constitutionally protected property interest” for many purposes.[8] The only court to seriously consider the argument in this subsection, the Eighth Circuit, has (twice) rejected the argument. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rob Robinson
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
Is the answer to Question 1 affected by the fact that the Member State has not implemented the Data Storage Directive despite the fact that the period prescribed for implementation has expired? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Crincoli, You can only race if you can’t win? [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
L’Oreal v. eBay: ECJ said eBay isn’t directly or contributorily liable under TM directive; nonetheless, injunctions must be available to rightholders under enforcement directive regardless of fault. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  This isn’t based on the anecdotal data that piracy sometimes funds terrorism; the concern at issue here is one of diplomatic relations/effective int’l negotiations. [read post]