Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 15,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2015, 10:38 am
New Hampshire Right to Life v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 11:46 am
The employees sued and, relying on the Supreme Court’s 1956 decision in Steiner v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:21 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:13 am
Kragnes v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:18 am
Chevron v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:43 am
Gifford v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 1:02 pm
Pietrangelo v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:37 am
Vasallo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:19 am
Petitioner Supap Kirtsaeng came to the United States from Thailand to study math at Cornell University. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm
As NSA Director Keith Alexander had indicated in an earlier declaration to the FISC, an internal NSA outfit—its Business Records FISA Compliance Review Team—had undertaken a thorough study of the agency’s “instrumentation and implementation” of FISC authorizations regarding telephony metadata. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:31 am
The majority decision in Richards v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:26 pm
See Tafas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:57 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights today handed down judgment in the case of Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:22 am
Monday’s opinion in Town of Greece v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:11 am
On Friday, the en banc Federal Circuit will hear argument in Lexmark v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
Yet the opening pages of Oleg V. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
United States (for a CT discussion see State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:11 am
Marie Tribe v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
This prescriber testimony was uncontroverted, so the defendant won, despite the state-law presumption.Odom v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:12 am
At the same time, Commissioner Aguilar issued this statement to note his disappointment with the study, mainly because it doesn't provide recommendations and because "I am particularly astonished that the Study states (at pages 58-59) that an option 'would be for Congress to take no action' and, thus, would continue to deny American investors who have been harmed by fraud the ability to seek redress in court. [read post]
