Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 112,788
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2023, 8:04 am
” 750 ILCS 5/602.7(c) If a breathalyzer test does get ordered, that is only the beginning. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:21 pm
How Does the Texas Supreme Court Work? [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Navy, and Trump’s co-defendant, was a part of the group directed to assist with this document transfer. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
”[6] Justice Kagan noted that the opinion is meant to be narrow, holding “only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and “the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
”[6] Justice Kagan noted that the opinion is meant to be narrow, holding “only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and “the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:04 pm
Although, he does hint at the temporal appropriateness of the VRA in his view. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:00 pm
He has argued successfully in the Supreme Court and is currently of counsel to Lawyers Defending American Democracy. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm
What challenges does this publication solve for practicing attorneys and law students? [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
But does this limitation apply to decisions of the D.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:26 pm
No doubt many litigants lost their careers and exhausted their life savings defending themselves against cases that violated their civil rights and, in the end, were all for naught. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:54 am
Does that tell us something about the Trump case? [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:11 am
How Does Illinois Law Define Consent? [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:57 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:11 am
It's a case about Defendants' alleged negligence in how it handles information. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
The Seventh Circuit reasoned, consistent with several other circuits, that even if a defendant’s statements are false under the best interpretation of an ambiguous provision, the defendant does not “knowingly” present false statements if there exists “an objectively reasonable reading of the statute or regulation” under which the statement was true.[3] In making that determination, the Seventh Circuit concluded, “a… [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:51 am
Lee Drutman defends fusion voting as a policy that modern reformers should push for: As a political scientist who studies electoral systems and the role of political parties in our democracy, I want to explain here why I see fusion… Continue reading The post “Lee Drutman responds to Steven Hill: ‘Yes, Fusion does offer a new horizon for US Politics'” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
That does not dilute David’s main point about the effects of judicial intervention, but it does tell us something about the extent to which we can rely on courts to strike the balance that David sees as the objective of federal actors generally. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:21 am
But a subpoena differs from a search and seizure warrant in that it does command the recipient to comply. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:24 am
Defendants’ statements made no mention of Plaintiff’s race, and even to the extent they could be read as accusing Plaintiff of being a racist, “a statement that someone is a ‘racist,’ while potentially indicating unfair dislike, does not indicate that the object of the statement is being rejected because of h[er] race. [read post]
