Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 6501 - 6520 of 15,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
  Those differences can be reduced (in this case at least) to two fundamental issues: (1) the way that facts are weighed and balanced; (2) the basic assumptions about the role of the investor in the face of norms that must be enforced. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:09 am by Joy Waltemath
Senate Bill 828 cleared the Oregon Senate on June 22 with a 23-6 vote, and the House on June 29 with a 46-13 ballot. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Administrator’s Interpretation No. 2015-1, issued on July 15, 2015, took the position that most workers are employees under the FLSA, not independent contractors. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm by Katherine O'Brien
  Nearly one third of all Americans are arrested before turning the age of 23. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:37 am by Joy Waltemath
In April 2016, the DOL obtained an extension moving the May 1 deadline for the reply brief to June 30. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am by Romano Beitsma
The fact that D1 does not contain any figures does not hinder the skilled person from understanding the described method or from carrying it out.2.4 D1 discloses a method for dispensing pharmaceuticals upon production of a prescription by the purchaser (page 6, lines 6-8) providing a dispensing machine containing a stock of prescribed pharmaceuticals (page 6, lines 19-20) - i.e. restricted goods in the sense of claim 1 - with an audio communication link from the … [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm by Dale Carpenter
Of course, that does not mean that the Texas DOMAs are constitutional or that the City may constitutionally deny benefits to its employees’ same-sex spouses. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:06 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
, at paras. 19-23; Kentucky Fried Chicken Canada v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm by David Kopel
” Second Amendment standards: The court addressed two questions: (1) “Does a law-abiding responsible citizen have a right to defend his home from criminals using whatever common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation? [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:38 am by Joy Waltemath
In April 2016, the department obtained an extension moving the May 1 deadline for the reply brief to June 30. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:26 am
Finally, on the estimated length of the trial, Hacon HHJ held that the maximum three day limit in IPEC should be sufficient, notwithstanding the complexity of the case, and provided that OS may revisit the question of a transfer at the CMC (at [21-23]). [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 2:00 am by Rhonda Shirreff
On May 23, 2017, the Ontario Government released The Changing Workplaces Review: An Agenda for Workplace Rights Final Report. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:48 pm by Doug Cornelius
The SEC revised its FAQ on Item 1.O and points out question that many people trip over in Item 1.O. [read post]