Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 8,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am
Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Basic v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Pre-Daubert Before the Supreme Court decided Daubert, few federal or state courts were willing to roll up their sleeves to evaluate the internal validity of epidemiologic studies. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 7:29 pm
In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Janus Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:18 pm
The panel majority concluded that the California Supreme Court would interpret its free speech clause by relying on federal judicial interpretations of the First Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:41 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of Amalfitano v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
District Court Preliminarily Enjoins Non-U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:18 pm
The District Court found that the announcement clause did not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm
”, and, (3) “it is already working mischief in the district courts. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
The District Court is subordinate to the Circuit Court, so, between the two, what the Circuit Court says, goes. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court, in Zehl v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
This case could just as easily gone the way the district court ruled. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:15 pm
The state courts rejected this claim, as did a federal district court, but the Third Circuit reversed. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:42 am
The Supreme Court has not gone so far, see Minneci v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:32 am
The state courts rejected this claim, as did a federal district court, but the Third Circuit reversed. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
” On the other hand, the Supreme Court’s rulings in Romer and in Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
In the midst of the media frenzy and for the first time, the cosmetics industry officially declared formaldehyde unsafe at any level in chemical hair straightening products, commonly referred to as keratin-based or the Brazilian Blowout. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
In the midst of the media frenzy and for the first time, the cosmetics industry officially declared formaldehyde unsafe at any level in chemical hair straightening products, commonly referred to as keratin-based or the Brazilian Blowout. [read post]
