Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 13,699
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:46 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:36 pm
The case is Dennis Flaherty v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
Accordingly both CTMs consisted exclusively of signs which may serve in trade to designate a characteristic of some of the goods for which those marks are registered and were thus invalidly registered.Had the CTMs acquired distinctive character after they were registered? [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
The original shot in this battle, arguing that the new patent package was setting a dangerous precedent since the EU Member States were stripping the Union of its powers, can be read here. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
The ACLU of Indiana filed a lawsuit yesterday challenging the prohibition in a newly enacted state law that keeps certain registered sex offenders from attending religious services. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:14 am
In Daimler AG v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
” In Pason Systems Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
Supreme Court in Fernandez-Vargas v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Fair enough, but Justice Breyer is relying here on a prior era, and one in which Texas (and other states) had but a single, or a few, messages it allowed on any of the plates registered in the State. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
Some other Member States, including France and Belgium, have laws which restrict – usually to non-commercial purposes – the use of such images without prior authorisation. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
The deadline for commenting to the WHD will be 60 days from the date of publication of the Proposed Rule in the Federal Register. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:23 pm
Compare (a) Standard Register Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:21 pm
The denial of review in Kobach v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Fictional memory, imaginary state of mind, imagined shopping experience—and then we complain that we don’t have ecologically valid evidence! [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am
. * Katz v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
Commentary on the Ninth Circuit (Opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
