Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTIONÂ "
Results 6521 - 6540
of 8,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2016, 3:03 pm
Here’s what it says: [A federal court] may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
Varrichio of the Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas granted summary judgment in favor of the carrier and denied the injured party’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in a declaratory judgment action regarding the household exclusion. [read post]
Private Censorship Is Not the Best Way to Fight Hate or Defend Democracy: Here Are Some Better Ideas
30 Jan 2018, 9:51 am
Anonymity and pseudonymity have played important roles throughout history, from secret ballots in ancient Greece to 18th century English literature and early American satire. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
American Trucking, and, most prominently and bizarrely, Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
As Americans, we mostly resolve our policy differences by casting ballots. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:01 am
By making slave status dependent on the mother, according to the principle of partus sequitur ventrem, (you are what your mother was), Maryland, like Virginia, abandoned the common-law approach of England, in which the social status of children depended on their father. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:16 pm
The decision to allow reopening of cases that would otherwise be subject to an expired statute of limitations is contrary to the constitutional principle of legality (non-retroactivity of law), he argued. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Gossett’s article Take off the [Color] Blinders: How Ignoring the Hague Convention’s Subsidiarity Principle Furthers Structural Racism Against Black American Children was cited in the following article: Jasmine B. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 10:01 am
So it must be with this generation of Americans. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Nor does the case affect political action committees or PACs, which can contribute directly to candidates. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
That case involved race-only affirmative action, but the Court upheld Congress’s actions seemingly pursuant to an intermediate scrutiny approach. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
More importantly it suggests the way that in international relations, at least in this instance, the stronger state makes use of legalities and the weaker appeals to politics and normative principles to advance their positions and interests. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 2:33 pm
So we need unprecedented action right now to deal with the unprecedented crisis. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
We first note the principle "that a statute ought, upon the whole, to be so construed that, if it can be preven [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:57 am
Such arguments say: the act of relieving suffering is not an intrinsically morally evil action; death is not the cause of the relief of suffering but rather the use of medication; and, foreseeable possible death is an unintended consequence of terminal sedation, but it is a consequence tolerated because the relief of suffering is of equal or greater value to offset that negative consequence of a hastened death. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 6:53 am
” (Again, such self-defense actions must comply with sovereignty and other international norms, such as the requirement that the response be necessary and proportionate vis-a-vis the future threat.) [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
Conservative and liberal rulings follow this principle. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Indeed, any 5-4 ruling next summer gutting Obamacare would no doubt be viewed by a wide swath of Americans first and foremost as a Republican-appointed Supreme Court doing the bidding for Republicans who don’t have the votes in Congress to repeal the divisive law. [read post]
