Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 8,263
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 8:42 pm
So this strikes me as laying the foundation for the real battle, and Stewart was laying clam to the terrain upon which she wants to fight. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:22 am
Date: Wednesday, December 8 Time: 2:00 – 3:30 PM ET Location: National Press Club’s Murrow Room. 529 14th Street NW, Washington, DC 20045 The panel follows Supreme Court arguments of Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
Now those questions will get an unprecedented hearing in the middle of a current murder trial: on Monday, a judge will hear evidence in the case of Texas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976) to last term, Justice Stevens was on the winning side of more of the major battles than any other justice. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm
On Monday, December 6, the Ninth Circuit will hear oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:31 pm
The latter route was foreclosed by a 1953 Court of Claims decision, Turney v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
Lord Phillips also re-named the defence as “honest comment” (as opposed to Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, which favoured “honest opinion” [35]) and called on the Law Commission to consider and review the present state of the defence. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:27 am
The United States Supreme Court may soon add some clarity to this area. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:49 am
However, the original eligible list had expired, preventing Ricks from being placed on a special eligible list on the basis of Deas v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:38 am
Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:05 am
Indeed, it agreed to renew the standard pre CCH v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
United States, while the Des Moines Register reports on Pepper v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm
The story began with Bush v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
However, many legal commentators have stated that Gawker had nowhere to run following a 1985 US Supreme Court decision of Harper & Row Publishers v Nation Enterprises which held that The Nation's unauthorized publication of a 400 word excerpt from an over 600 page autobiography of former President Ford did not qualify as fair use. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm
But Feldman does not try to make too much of the contemporary relevance of the battles he describes: this is a first-rate work of narrative history that succeeds in bringing the intellectual and political battles of the post-Roosevelt Court vividly to life. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:06 am
Battle, 27 M.J. 781 (A.F.C.M.R. 1988); and United States v. [read post]
