Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 33,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Most constitutional law professors probably teach South Dakota v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:47 pm
Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:48 pm
In Gordon v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:06 pm
Regular readers know that I am working on a forthcoming (with Foundation Press Book) Advanced Corporation Law: A Practical Approach to Corporate Governance. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:41 am
Among his numerous successes is the $570M breach of contract and patent infringement verdict for his client in Medtronic v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:51 am
Briefing is now complete on the petitions for certiorari in the Blair v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:41 pm
James School in Torrance, California, beginning in 2013. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:47 pm
McGirt v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:25 pm
In McPherson v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:12 pm
” It’s likely that additional case law interpreting SB 35 may use, or at least cite to, the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s SB 35 Guidelines issued in November 2018. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
Baum v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am
California, 19-532Issue: Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of aliens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:25 pm
Bielousov v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
The Guardian had a piece “UK contact-tracing app could fall foul of privacy law, government told”. [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:38 pm
(vi)) and – equally unsurprisingly – subject the company’s legal relationship with its users to the laws of California (clause 22/20.1), courts have so far been slow to attach significance to such platform choices of law as with regard to the relationship between individual users. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 2:28 pm
Tiny burden, big benefit.To be clear: Not the law in California, however. [read post]
8 May 2020, 10:19 am
Tilkey v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:58 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]