Search for: "Little v State"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 26,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2019, 6:48 pm
With little useful guidance from the parties, no controlling precedent, and the three-year post-remittitur deadline for bringing the case to trial about to expire, the experienced and highly regarded trial judge concluded it does neither. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Thus, overruling Hall would do little to help state dignity but could unfairly foreclose relief for plaintiffs like Hyatt. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 8:03 am
Wallace v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am
” In short, Golsteyn’s case reveals what happens when the immovable tension between the Commander-in-Chief Clause and the Take Care Clause of Article II of the Constitution meets the unrelenting force of a vocally opinionated Commander-in-Chief with little history of concern for traditional judicial norms of independence. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 1:01 pm
Or a nice little short one that's pretty simple? [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 11:18 am
In Ward v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Lopez v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm
Clearly, big attention-grabbing cases such as Lloyd Rayney v The State of Western Australia (damages of $1.8m, including damages for economic loss, with another $773,866 in interest), Rebel Wilson v Women’s Day, Women’s Weekly, New Weekly and OK! [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 10:38 am
The opinion is a little fuzzy on exactly how much. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 7:56 am
State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court reiterated this concern in its 1960 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:17 pm
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-1 v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Keefe, 402 U.S. 415, 419 (1971) respectively; the latter decision was a little more than a month before New York Times Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
According to Harold Green’s daughter, the purpose of the UBS account was, as follows: As you know, ever since you have been a little girl, I have taught you that we need to have a safe haven because I am Jewish. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
Plaintiffs in Daubert v. [read post]
