Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 2:34 am
If the COLOURBLIND case (Pangyrus Ltd v OHIM, RSVP Design Ltd, Case T-257/11) had been a movie, it would have secured a nomination for its intricate screenplay, in the spirit of the recent Academy Awards. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:31 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc.,522 F.3d 1299, 1304 (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:36 am
We do not pursue this matter further because whether he is subject to the UCMJ or not, Trump could fire him for disobeying an order in any event.) [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm
One of those "Oh, I know I wasn't employed at the time of the accident but I was just about to start a new job" kind of claim. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:34 am
As for Beauregard claims, perhaps he hasn’t read Cybersource? [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:08 am
A cop who lacks any basis for believing you've committed a crime, can simply follow you as you drive until you inevitably violate some traffic law, no matter how minor. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:34 pm
And it doesn’t matter that the intrusion would actually cause only modest harm to you, or that allowing the intrusion would cause only modest harm to the social interests served by property law (e.g., the interest in encouraging people to invest in improving land, something you hadn’t done). [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
Review on a writ of certiorari is not a matter of right, but of judicial discretion. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 11:12 am
The majority of accident victims don’t know that the non earner benefit (or any other accident benefits for that matter) are available to them following a car accident in Ontario. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 1:15 pm
Why does this matter? [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 3:18 pm
I don’t know how you can do an emergency hearing by video without violating the 6th amendments “right…to be confronted with the witnesses against him. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 3:18 pm
I don’t know how you can do an emergency hearing by video without violating the 6th amendments “right…to be confronted with the witnesses against him. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
John B. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
However, while it is clear that a Family Court judge has jurisdiction (power) to make orders of this sort via FPR 12.73(1)(b), there will inevitably be cases where, for reasons of complexity or gravity, it is appropriate for the matter to be allocated to a judge with High Court powers. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:29 am
Being it is another matter, but the digital natives appear incapable of distinguishing between the fiction they create and what us old timers think of as reality.Nobody would watch a show on the tube about a lawyer researching an issue for hours. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
Breyer, Ginsburg, and Stevens, the Court's centrists (no matter what the press keeps saying, there hasn't been a true liberal on the Court since Brennan and Marshall retired), said you can't kill kids and you can't kill people who don't themselves kill. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:42 am
I don't think a regulation to that effect could be written given the statutory language. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm
Does it matter that no one on the Biden-Harris bus was going to vote? [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 7:10 pm
But regardless of whether you could get there as an interpretive matter, maybe it would be a good approach. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:54 am
Now, frankly, the RTM isn't where this is important. [read post]
