Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6521 - 6540
of 21,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
Art. 8(5) EUTMR, whereby the owner of a mark with a reputation can prevent the registration of a mark the use of which would take unfair advantage of the reputation, states that such use must be “without due cause”. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
My trade mark opposition has been dismissed! [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Today marks the 90th anniversary of the landmark Olmstead v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
The discipline involved Groia’s defence in R. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 11:02 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
On this theory, Congress simply needs to alter the proposing language and no ratifying states will be marked tardy. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:12 pm
[State of Texas v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Grayson Clary discussed the split circuit court opinions on the government’s authority to search electronic devices at the border, focusing on the Eleventh Circuit’s May 23 ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:17 pm
In the face of a similar First Amendment challenge, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 1:35 pm
In Manhattan International Trade, Inc. and Pure & Simple Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:55 pm
In Ericsson v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:02 pm
In Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:16 pm
Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
In these cases, too, the state belatedly disclosed the prosecution’s notes in the capital trials. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:54 pm
” (citations andinternal quotation marks omitted) (second alteration inoriginal)). [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
