Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 119,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2010, 5:16 am
(quoting Marchant v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:20 pm
After the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
(Miller v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
Lucas v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:25 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Letelier v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm
” State v Hoshijo ex rel. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:44 am
In May 2014, he received a Juris Doctor degree fromWashington University in St. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm
In the case of Harley v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:50 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:22 pm
Gilstrap--whose more formal title is Chief United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas--handed down a scheduling order in the Ericsson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 6:25 am
Supreme Court in Waller v. [read post]
15 May 2025, 4:37 am
The Homeland Security Department is planning to acquire a new Gulfstream V jet, an agency official confirmed yesterday. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Neither Kennedy v. [read post]