Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 6521 - 6540 of 7,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
Essays on the Compensation Act 2006 and Human Rights Act 1998 bring the current state of the interplay between tort, politics and legislation to the forefront. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
In another First Department decision earlier this month, the court in Newman v Newman affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Barry R. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
9th Circuit Finds No Infringement in Steinbeck Family Feud https://t.co/IGk8NsUayr 2017-11-19 Everyone has been hacked, say police | News | The Times & The Sunday Times https://t.co/LUKYEqUp29 2017-11-19 United States: A Collection of Articles Commemorating Zeran v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R(Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice presented the UK Supreme Court with the question of whether compensation for miscarriage of justice should only be payable to someone was subsequently shown conclusively to have been innocent of the offence, or whether it should be open to anyone whose conviction has been declared unsafe. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Apple v Samsung v Apple v Samsung v Apple....Last year the AmeriKat was constantly up-to-date reporting on the latest of the patent mobile phone wars. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: this is part of the challenge—innovation folks usually don’t have to think about public law and state v. federal. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Supp. 2d 1063: Question: did DMV.org create confusion about affiliation with a state agency? [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:46 pm
  In the latest round of the Deseret saga, the Sierra Club has filed a petition challenging the legality of the Johnson memo. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by David Smith
Hot tubbing is a round table meeting of experts and lawyers chaired by a judge which seeks to examine expert evidence in a non-adversarial manner. [read post]