Search for: "State v. David."
Results 6521 - 6540
of 13,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
It applied a test drawn from the concurring opinion of Justice David Souter in the 2009 case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm
Following the Upper Tribunal judgment in SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) [our report], the DWP has issued a Circular - HB U6/2014 The thing is that it isn't quite right, in some quite important ways. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process claims. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
By V. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 3:24 am
(See Moseley v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 1:25 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:53 am
In The New England Journal of Medicine, Nicholas Bagley, David Jones, and Timothy Jost discuss the possible impact of a decision in favor of the challengers in King v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Predicting the Fallout from King v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
That’s why EFF filed a “friend of the court” brief in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
As Vikram David Amar and Alan E. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Administrative convenience can “never justify the offering of single-sex classes,” the clarification states. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 10:08 am
In Powell v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Texas Division, Son of Confederate Veterans, involving a state’s power to create a specialty license plate program which controls the messages that may be displayed; Brumfield v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 4:00 pm
In Peterson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Jeremy gives the floor to Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (Shakespeares), who report on 118 Data Resource Limited v IDS Data Services Limited and others [2014] EWHC 3629 (Ch), a High Court, England and Wales, ruling of Deputy Judge David Halpern QC, in which they represented the defendants. [read post]
