Search for: "Block v. State"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 9,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
” This continues the sordid state of affairs that existed prior to the pandemic, where hundreds of criminal cases were being dismissed annually for delay[9]. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm
Purnell, 652 F.3d 524, 532 (2011), quoting Tennessee v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 2:27 pm
New York v. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 9:40 am
D’Aubigny v Khan & Anor (2025) EWCA Civ 11 (Not on Bailii yet, a copy of the judgment is here.) [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:31 pm
The lawsuits – one filed by a coalition of twenty-one states (State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:35 am
The November argument was in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:58 am
Section 230 does block state criminal prosecutions, but that’s not an “all purpose” card and it’s the entire point of a statutory immunity (i.e., to remove liability that otherwise exists to facilitate other socially beneficial activity while preserving criminal liability for the primary wrongdoer). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
(I have it relatively easy, as I live a block away from "Cab Corridor" -- Clinton Street & Atlantic, where the taxis head back to the Brooklyn Bridge). [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 7:11 am
Nyanzi v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
MRT, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:31 pm
P.D. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 8:21 am
Patel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:47 am
WRB, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 10:34 am
The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:22 am
Deal v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 2:24 pm
And in the Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:19 pm
In Kinik v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
Google refused, and limited the delisting to (1) searches performed on the domain names corresponding to the versions of its search engine in the Member States of the EU; and (2) “geo-blocking” of the delisted results “regardless of the version of search engine used” on the basis of a search conducted using an IP address deemed to be located in the State of residence of the person concerned. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:55 pm
His application (Callahan v. [read post]
