Search for: "Compli, Inc." Results 6541 - 6560 of 11,555
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am by Steven Buchwald
Oracle USA, Inc. v Rimini St., Inc, 2014 WL 576097 (D. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am by Steven Buchwald
Oracle USA, Inc. v Rimini St., Inc, 2014 WL 576097 (D. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 7:39 am by Steven Buchwald
Oracle USA, Inc. v Rimini St., Inc, 2014 WL 576097 (D. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
The federal Civil Rights Act similarly gives employees, public or private, the right to an exemption from generally applicable work rules that interfere with the employees’ religious practices, unless the exemption would work an “undue hardship” on an employer.[55] Under these rules, Muslim employees could sometimes claim exemptions from some employer dress codes or hairstyle rules.[56] Muslim litigants or witnesses could claim exemptions from court rules that require people to… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:51 am by Ken White
Robert Welch, Inc. (1974) 418 U.S. 323, 347 [states may define their own law of liability for defamation, but must remain within Constitutional limits]. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The upshot of the points, taken together, is that Hobby Lobby's own brief calls into serious question whether the plaintiffs have alleged facts sufficient to establish that the HHS rule imposes a substantial burden on their exercise of religion.As for the first question:  Hobby Lobby's brief, like Conestoga Wood's, confirms that these cases are not really about the question of corporate religious exercise that has dominated the briefing and public reporting.Hobby Lobby makes little… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Nestlé Waters North American Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Cont’l Motors, Inc., No. 1110786, 2013 WL 3481949, at *3 (Ala. 2013). [43]. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 11:31 am by Leiza Dolghih
Amistco Separation Products, Inc. dissolved a temporary injunction order that sought to enforce contractual non-compete and non-solicitation obligations because the order was both not specific enough and overbroad. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 4:30 am by Steven Gursten
Learn how at one of the workshops being sponsored by The Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault (CPAN), the Brain Injury Association of Michigan, Walk The Line to Spinal Cord Injury Recovery and Health Partners, Inc. [read post]