Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 7,520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am
For more on this argument, see this interesting article on city v. suburban fortunes in the current recession. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am
Close enough for government work. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 3:43 am
(City of New York v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:27 am
Make no mistake - these folks are trying to push back and to effectively undo the decision in CCH v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:44 am
See Murphy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm
Thomas-Ashley v Drum Housing Association Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 265 This is probably the biggest single week for dog-related possession claims ever. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:45 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Republicans—whether it’s Bush v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:09 pm
Closing Remarks by Prof. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
If it is anything close to the estimated $52 million a year proposed, it would not take long to earn back the money spent. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
. - Chris Anderson, South Coast Today, March 4, 2010 City officials are pushing for the remaining funds in the New Bedford Harbor trust to be allocated to city projects, arguing that the money should be spent as close as possible to where the damage from the long-running contamination of the harbor occurred. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:09 am
The Appellate Decision in Steven Von Duerring, v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
It’s not exactly bootstrapping, but it’s close. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:12 am
(Image Michelle V. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:24 am
& 2nd house I am going to lose because of no good fucking government like you and pieces of shit like you. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In Illinois v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:45 am
" Bloate v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
The case, Lawyers Funds for Client Protection v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:23 pm
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has received a Memorandum from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) marked “Top Secret” that includes a detailed report of a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) closed hearing regarding the subject of enhanced interrogation techniques. [read post]
