Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 6541 - 6560
of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 3:02 pm
Defendants thus appeared to be nothing more than sellers of fungible goods in a complex series of transactions that were directed by foreign gangs.The decision is European Community v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 10:45 pm
Ericson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
In Peterson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
"While privity of contract is generally necessary to state a cause of action for attorney malpractice, liability is extended to third parties, not in privity, for harm caused by professional negligence in the presence of fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances" (Good Old Days Tavern v Zwirn, 259 AD2d 300, 300; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am
Never Too Late 292 [Week ending November 22] [Guest post] The Implementation of Article 17 CDSMD in EU Member States and the Evolution of the Digital Services Act: Why the Ban on General Monitoring Obligations Must Not Be Underestimated | Cannabis, conceptual comparison, and online evidence: Tertulia on EUIPO Boards of Appeal Case Law November 2020 | Mind the gap: Beijing IP Court explains the adverse effect clause of China’s Trade Mark… [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:19 am
Bacardi & Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
This post was written by Mark S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
FUJIFILM SonoSite, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:05 am
Wisconsin Cheese Group, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 10:26 am
The briefing cites to Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:42 am
Yesterday forty-eight states – all save Virginia and Maine — filed an amicus brief in next Term’s case Snyder v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 12:34 pm
Real USFL, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:42 pm
This marked reduced earning capacity is not factored into a divorce, since settlements focus on dividing marital property. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:41 am
[v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:33 pm
Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:03 am
TBMP § 1113.01.Early Recognition claimed the right to exclusive use of the subject mark for the entire United States, except for the County of San Francisco within the state of California. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:53 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
