Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 13,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2007, 10:12 pm
" United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:30 am
Brown v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:42 pm
Interestingly, the Supreme Court of the United States seems poised to reach the same result in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
The Hague Convention has the force of law within the United Kingdom by virtue of CACA 1985, s 1(2). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am
Today the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:32 am
Those assets should then be distribited to holders of debt owed by the “old Chrysler,” the funds argued in Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Curtis V. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
”* See also Stevens v New York State Thruway Authority, 2013 NY Slip Op 07235, Appellate Division, Third Department, a case involving essentially the same issues, posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2013/2013_07235.htmThe Massaro decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2013/2013_07234.htm. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
“The Noerr-Pennington doctrine protects the right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to petition the government for governmental action, including through litigation and activity incidental to litigation” (Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d 67, 77 [citation omitted]; see Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d 101, 106-107). [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:04 pm
To us, the decision seemed contrary to the rule stated in Branick. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:58 am
The Supreme Court of this state has never decided this question, in so far as we have been able to ascertain, but we are not left in the dark in the matter, because we find that no less eminent authority than the Supreme Court of the United States long ago decided this very question. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 5:09 pm
On February 7, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in a per curiam ruling decided the 215 Members of Congress did not have standing to sue President Donald Trump over alleged violations of the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 5:09 pm
On February 7, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in a per curiam ruling decided the 215 Members of Congress did not have standing to sue President Donald Trump over alleged violations of the U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:34 am
United States Subscription Required U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:02 am
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 5:07 am
On June 21, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion on the hotly contested issue of compensation allowed to Division I student-athletes for their athletic participation. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
The big loser, of course, was the United States, now rated a flawed democracy because of the quantitative effects of Mr. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
