Search for: "See v. See" Results 6561 - 6580 of 121,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 1:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the defendants' cross motion was made more than 120 days after the note of issue was filed and, therefore, was untimely (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648), an untimely cross motion for summary judgment may be considered by the court where, as here, a timely motion for summary judgment was made on nearly identical grounds (see Grande v Peteroy, 39 AD3d 590, 592; Lennard v Khan, 69 AD3d 812, 814; Bressingham v Jamaica Hosp. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 If you watch carefully, you can almost see Henry’s JAG advisor having an aneurysm during the speech. [read post]