Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 6,733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm
That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
” President Poroshenko was ebullient as the results began to come in, saying at a news conference that “‘more than three-quarters of voters who took part in the polls gave strong and irreversible backing to Ukraine’s path to Europe. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
They may therefore be more reluctant than legislators or voters to adopt what they see as logically unsound compromises, which is how the judges in bloc I would view result A. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
“The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public,” Judge Carter wrote. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 11:14 pm
Just as it is not very meaningful for a voter to vote "non-Reagan,"' it is not very helpful to tell a judge to be a "non-originalist. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:46 am
In the 2012 United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
More broadly, of course a campaigning public official has to be able to express his views about foreign policy, and statements to voters framed as demands to foreign officials are a pretty normal and constitutionally protected means of doing so. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
According to news reports I've seen, if a majority of the voters support this at the polls, an amendment will be added to the California Constitution stating the following: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 7:31 am
Supreme Court’s transformative ruling in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
In answering that question, consider how GottaLaff and her commenters deal with communications from the guy who wrote the poll app — who says he is an Obama voter. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
Circuit (Jan. 26, 2010) (explaining that "the court strongly urges parties to limit the use of acronyms"), with Int'l Org. of Masters, Mates & Pilots, ILA, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:19 am
There are many causes, but a few specific incidents stand out: Russia’s interference with the 2016 presidential election, including voter manipulation via social media; Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica data leakage; and the Nancy Pelosi “cheapfake” video (where her speech was slowed down to give the impression she was drunk). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 12:48 pm
Remember how during the Sarah Palin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
