Search for: "A, B & C Insurance Companies" Results 641 - 660 of 2,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2018, 5:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(c)           Does the D&O policy contain a professional services exclusion? [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:00 am by Michael B. Stack
Sentencing Guidelines Manual §§ 2B1.1(b)(10)(C), 3B1.1(a), as well as the court's failure to vary downward, and its restitution award. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:55 am
California Health and Safety Code section 1371.4(b) provides that: "A health care service plan, or its noncontracting medical providers, shall reimburse providers for emergency services and care provided to its enrollees, until the care results in stabilization of the enrollee, except as provided in subdivision (c). [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:34 am by Chip Merlin
’ The explicit language of a separate contract in Clause C shows the parties intended a simple loss payable under clause B and a standard mortgage clause under clause C. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
S.E.C., 647 F.3d 1144 (2011), American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
The defendant's insurance company eventually hires an attorney to: a) deny it was he who ran the light, b) deny that it was a significant impact, and c) deny that the impact caused any injuries or if they did. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 8:46 am
The decision by Aflac--the insurance company known for its television commercials featuring a talking duck--to give shareholders an annual advisory vote on executive pay practices may prompt other major U.S. companies to follow suit. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess… [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 8:35 pm by Megan Muir
The SEC also included a form of “grandfather” provision in new Rule 506(c)(2)(ii)(D), which provides that for existing investors who were accredited investors in a Rule 506(b) offering prior to the effective date of Rule 506(c), a self-certification of accreditation status by such investor at the time of sale in a new offering by the same issuer under Rule 506(c) will be deemed to satisfy the verification requirement in Rule 506(c). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:10 am by Chijioke Okorie
The court held that it would be against public interest and competition in the insurance industry to allow Discovery to exclude other insurance companies from offering policyholders the option of using their vitality status for purposes of receiving cash-back benefits from their insurance providers. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 pm by Machael Heise
(Your general exclusions section should be reviewed to ensure there are no conflicts with 10295.16.)Explain the process for certification of chronic illness as outlined in 10295(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I)-(IV).Include lump sum and periodic payment options 10295.1(a)(3).Allow multiple accelerations on the same and different qualifying events 10295.1(b)(2) & (3).Include an explanation and a numeric illustration of how the insured will pay for the acceleration per… [read post]