Search for: "Appeal of Hughes" Results 641 - 660 of 2,188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review, heard 23 Oct 2018. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hughes, Lloyd-Jones and Lady Black allowed the appeal. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am by Adam Feldman
The big spikes are from around the Hughes/Stone Courts (1930-1946) through the Burger Court (1969-1986). [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court by a majority of 4 to 1 (Lord Hughes dissenting) dismissed MM’s appeal. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review, heard 23 Oct 2018. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
  The appeal was dismissed ([2018] EWCA Civ 2591). [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:06 am by Dennis Crouch
  Judge Stoll authored the majority opinion that was joined by Judge Hughes. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 12:04 pm
See here for further details and to apply.Author: Rose Hughes [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 5:15 am by Steve Brachmann
The Federal Circuit panel of Circuit Judges Pauline Newman, Raymond Chen and Todd Hughes determined that on the issue of secondary considerations... [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 5:15 am by Steve Brachmann
On Friday, November 9th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential decision in NuVasive, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review, heard 23 Oct 2018. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 5:15 am by Gene Quinn
Without any explanation, analysis or justification, Chief Judge Prost, and Judges Reyna and Hughes affirmed the decision of colleague Judge Bryson. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 5:15 am by Gene Quinn
Without any explanation, analysis or justification, Chief Judge Prost, and Judges Reyna and Hughes affirmed the decision of colleague Judge Bryson. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
Both of these claims were found invalid for insufficiency by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review, heard 23 Oct 2018. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
In an INFORRM post Hugh Stephens considers the implications for copyright law due to legislating for internet regulation. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
I recently had the honour to be invited to give a guest lecture to the Copyright Society of Australia in Sydney. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review, heard 23 Oct 2018. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 86-87 (2009) (criticizing the blatantly incorrect interpretation of confidence intervals by the Brock court). 2 Zach Hughes, “The Legal Significance of Statistical Significance,” 28 Westlaw Journal: Pharmaceutical 1, 2 (Mar. 2012). 3 See Norman E. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 12:30 am by Joseph Arshawsky
Baker Hughes Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1141, 18 October 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]