Search for: "B. v. S." Results 641 - 660 of 57,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
US Supreme Court: FTC Cannot Seek Equitable Monetary Relief in Section 13(b) Cases
21 Apr 2021, 10:00 pm
The Court’s April 22, 2021, decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
Up & Atom - https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/upandatom
US Supreme Court: FTC Cannot Seek Equitable Monetary Relief in Section 13(b) Cases
21 Apr 2021, 10:00 pm
The Court’s April 22, 2021, decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
Well Done - https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/welldone
Sherman Act Antitrust Claims Are Not Held to Rule 9(b) Heightened Pleading Standards
15 Feb 2007, 3:32 am
After Hours Formalwear, Inc. v. [read post]
Chicago IP Litigation Blog - http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/
Fraud Claim Requires Rule 9(b) Heightened Pleading
8 Jun 2016, 3:31 am by R. David Donoghue
Ariel Investments, LLC v. [read post]
Chicago IP Litigation Blog - http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Can Cardi B Get an Injunction Stopping Tasha K from Repeating Libelous Statements?
7 Mar 2022, 12:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
[Yevhen V says likely yes.] [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
New UCL public prosecutor decision: People ex rel. Gallegos v. Pacific Lumber Company
30 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The Court's opinion in People ex rel. [read post]
The UCL Practitioner - http://www.uclpractitioner.com/
Wang v. Chinese Daily News: On Remand From SCOTUS After Wal-Mart, Ninth Circuit Reverses In Part Judgment for Class of Employees and Remands
15 May 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
In Wang v. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
Senate Commerce Committee Chair Pushes One-Sided 13(b) Fix
4 May 2022, 9:39 am by John E. Villafranco, William C. MacLeod and Maggie C. Crosswy
The one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
Ad Law Access - http://www.adlawaccess.com
Is class certification pursuant to Rule 23(b)(1)(B) restricted to cases involving a "limited fund"?
23 Aug 2007, 3:05 am
In so holding, the Court concluded that the Supreme Court’s holding in Ortiz v. [read post]
Class Action Blog - http://www.carltonfields.com/classactionblog/blog.aspx
Northern District Court certifies under 23(b)(2) a class of shift workers alleging meal period violations at a Shell refinery
25 Apr 2011, 2:43 pm by The Complex Litigator
 Gardner v. [read post]
the complex litigator - http://www.thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/
Hefczyc v. Rady Children's Hospital (Cal. Ct. App. - Nov. 17, 2017)
17 Nov 2017, 3:46 pm
 I think it's abundantly clear that there's no controlling California Supreme Court precedent that governs the issue as to whether California requires the (b)(3) prerequisites to be met even in (b)(2) -- or, for that matter, (b)(1) -- cases.So there's flexibility there.And there's substantial reason to make the rules different. [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
DC Circuit: First-to-file qui tam, even if inadequate under Rule 9(b), barred later suit
4 Dec 2011, 10:38 pm by Ben Vernia
Batiste v. [read post]
False Claims Counsel - http://www.falseclaimscounsel.com/wordpress
Tobin & Tobin on Moore v. United States
5 Jul 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Donald B. [read post]
Legal Theory Blog - https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
New class certification opinion: Hefczyc v. Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego
29 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
In Hefczyc v. [read post]
The UCL Practitioner - http://www.uclpractitioner.com/
Reimbursing NYSHIP Medicare-eligible retirees for Medicare Part B premiums
15 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
Munger appealed and the Appellate Division reinstated that branch of her petition seeking reimbursement for Medicare Part B premium payments Ruling that the issue of the school district's obligation to reimburse Munger and her co-plaintiffs for their Medicare part B premiums was not decided in the prior arbitration proceeding, the Appellate Division held that the arbitrator's award did not have preclusive effect on Munger's Article 78… [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Case of the Day: Chamberlain v. Integraclick, Inc.
22 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day, Chamberlain v. [read post]
Letters Blogatory - http://lettersblogatory.com/
Salinier v. Moore, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 3515699 (D.Colo.) [France] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
29 Jul 2012, 7:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
" 42 U.S.C. s 11607(b)(3). [read post]
A Child is Missing - http://joelbrandes.blogspot.com/
Blog Post: CA2 on Credibility: Belkaniya v. Garland
17 Aug 2023, 7:44 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Belkaniya v. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
Non-Signatories Bound By Merger Agreement’s Indemnification Provisions
12 Aug 2021, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
While that avoided Audax’s Section 251(b) […] [read post]
DealLawyers.com Blog - http://www.deallawyers.com/Blog/
The constitutionality of S.B. 1070
11 Jul 2011, 7:28 am by Richard Samp - Guest
Since then, the legal landscape was changed considerably by the Supreme Court’s May decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/