Search for: "Black v. State Bar"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2022, 2:19 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Thornburg v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am
The issue is moot, however, given plaintiffs’ failure to advance a viable claim. * Nat’l Coalition on Black Civic Participation v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
Citing Phillips v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:26 am
Will the State Bar do so? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
US (black mold, housing, federal breach of trust) Franco v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:00 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
The Houston native returned to Texas in 1960, and became one of the only three black women to pass the bar and practice law in the state. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:11 pm
Briefly on the First Amendment issue, it's no different analytically than requiring a contractor to pledge that the business does not refuse to hire Muslims, or Jews, or blacks, veterans, or another state-designated group. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 2:24 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:42 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 6:06 pm
Turner v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
While affirming summary judgment for the bank because its claim was not barred under the four-year SOL, the Court reaffirmed that a blanket contractual waiver of all statute-of-limitations defenses is against public policy in Texas and therefore unenforceable. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm
Clancy v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 11:31 am
Summary of today’s Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Black, 102 Cal. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Black, 102 Cal. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:24 am
See Sisk v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 1:27 pm
In more Scotus news: On Friday, the High Court agreed to decide whether state officials are barred from investigating the lending practices of national banks. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
Holder and Shelby County v. [read post]
