Search for: "Board of Education v. County Board of Education"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2023, 7:30 am
Mannion 50th Senate District : Allows an individual with disabilities or a disabled veteran to hold full-time or part-time positions for purposes of eligibility for recruitment for state employment S6861 by Robert Jackson 31st Senate District : Would provides for the automatic enrollment of employees of the City of New York eligible to join the New York City Board of Education Retirement System other than individuals provisional appointed S6862 by Robert Jackson… [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am
This, said the Appellate Division, constituted substantial evidence to support the determination that the employee was guilty of falsifying town records.Ghita v Department of Education of the City of New York2008 NY Slip Op 30706(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0110481/2007 [Not selected for publications in the Official Reports]The employee challenged an arbitrator’s determination terminating his employment with the New York City Department of… [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:57 am
MADISON COUNTY v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:16 am
Servs., 2010 NY Slip Op 20289, Decided on July 20, 2010, Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Alexander W. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
The Los Angeles Times has this story about a pending California Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:40 am
Monroe County Board of Education. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:44 am
This, said the Appellate Division, constituted substantial evidence to support the determination that Gustafson was guilty of falsifying town records.Ghita v Department of Education of the City of New York, 2008 NY Slip Op 30706(U), March 7, 2008, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0110481/2007 - Mircea Ghita challenged an arbitrator's determination terminating his employment with the New York City Department of Education after finding him guilty… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
Panetta (Al-Awlaki v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:27 am
Bd. of Educ., 466 F.3d 232] nor local school districts in New York State were arms of the state [Fay v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
Bd. of Educ., 466 F.3d 232] nor local school districts in New York State were arms of the state [Fay v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:54 am
Detroit Board of Education, which allowed for mandatory public sector union dues. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:40 pm
Board of Education Tucker County. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
Nevertheless, Georgia courts have held that “a county board of education . . . is merely the agency through which the county, as a subdivision of the State, acts in school matters. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:55 pm
Chester County Employees’ Retirement Fund v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Dept., 206 AD3d 1334. ** The Appellate Division noted that in support of the proposition that it is not a local authority, Corporation cited Matter of Farms First, contending it was an independent entity formed by private businessmen to further their own interests, has never been furnished offices at County expense, has never had a County employee serve on its board and receives some of its funding from private individuals and corporations. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Dept., 206 AD3d 1334. ** The Appellate Division noted that in support of the proposition that it is not a local authority, Corporation cited Matter of Farms First, contending it was an independent entity formed by private businessmen to further their own interests, has never been furnished offices at County expense, has never had a County employee serve on its board and receives some of its funding from private individuals and corporations. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
” In Santer v Board of Educ. of E. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:08 am
Johnston County Board of Education in which a teacher in the course of teaching evolution answered religious objections to evolution. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:29 pm
Last week, in Bell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
As it is well settled that the tenure rights of teachers are a matter of public interest, the notice of claim provisions of Education Law §3813(1) are not applicable to cases seeking to enforce such [Sephton v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of New York, 99 AD2d 509, 510 (2d Dept), appeal denied 62 NY2d 605]. [read post]
