Search for: "Bonds v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 4,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
"They get a big hit, like Andrew or bigger, they're going to have to go to the bond markets at a time that it's not good to go to a bond market," said Walter Dartland, executive director of the Consumer Federation of the Southeast, a consumer watchdog group. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Company – Chevron v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 5:15 am
We have been writing a bit about the competitive threat about to be unleashed on Starbucks as McDonalds inserts baristas in its 14,000 resturants in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
In U.S. ex rel IGW Electric LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2006, 7:56 pm
BONDS, Petitioner, v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Emily Phelps recounts the testimony of North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick at last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on a proposed constitutional amendment on campaign finance reform in light of the Chief Justice’s comments on donor influence in McCutcheon v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
The irony is that the money the states and local governments receive from Washington is derived either from federal taxes paid by residents of the states or from the sale of bonds that their children will have to redeem. . . . [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am
Notable cases include Bond v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am
Notable cases include Bond v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:43 am
Related Web Resources: Institutional Capital Management Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
Campfield v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 6:49 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Connecticut v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Benjamin v Ahren Bennett and United States of America Bond v Progressive Ins Co Capobianco v Simolike Heim v Medical Care Knopick v Connelly People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:34 am
Affirming, the state supreme court noted that HansaWorld asked the lower court, both in its brief and at the July 13 hearing, to condition any relief given to the employee on her posting a bond, but she neither wrote a response brief nor objected at the hearing when the judge stated he was going to require the $100,000 bond. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:37 pm
Because the "effective" clause in the bond condition of the 2009 Certification did not operate to block or delay the federal licensing proceeding, and it did not contravene Section 401(a)(1)'s waiver provision, much less the Commission's regulations, Alcoa Power's objections to the substantive content of the 2009 Certification is a matter of State law that is properly raised in the State proceeding, as Alcoa Power has done. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 8:27 am
Apple v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:29 am
He decided in People v. [read post]
