Search for: "California v. Scott" Results 641 - 660 of 1,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2008, 12:44 pm
That's the title of an OpEd by GWU Law prof Jonathan Turley in yesterday's Los Angeles Times regarding Indiana v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
They fought against the passage of California’s Proposition 12, the country’s strongest farm animal protection law, and then its implementation, all the way to the Supreme Court, which decided against them in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Hunter, Princeton University  Scott Kurashige, University of Michigan The year 2013 marks the anniversaries of two major events in the history of black freedom struggles—the March on Washington’s fiftieth and the Emancipation Proclamation’s sesquicentennial. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:46 pm by Matthew Seligman - Guest
”  Thus, the California state court’s decision was an unreasonable application of the Supreme Court’s decision in Strickland v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
The lone suspect, Scott Michael Greene, was apprehended a few hours after the shootings. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 3:23 am by Broc Romanek
Here’s the intro from this Cooley blog by Cydney Posner (and here’s a blog on whether Congress will actually revisit the conflict minerals rule): According to this article from the Washington Post with Bloomberg, in February, House Financial Services Committee Chair Jeb Hensarling and three other House members (Scott Garrett of New Jersey, Bill Huizenga of Michigan, and Ed Royce of California) sent a letter to SEC Chair Mary Jo White urging that the SEC end its appeal… [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
The lone suspect, Scott Michael Greene, was apprehended a few hours after the shootings. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:54 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The opinion of the Court that Liptak notes being revised is Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:38 am by Walter Olson
[David Oliver] U.S Attorney in Maryland didn’t think Lauren Stevens case was strong enough to indict [Sue Reisinger/Corporate Counsel, White Collar Law Prof, Legal Ethics Forum, my Cato take] “The SLAPP-Happy Story of Rakofsky v. [read post]