Search for: "Carrie Wright"
Results 641 - 660
of 737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
They were directed to carry on their activities in accordance with regulations and directions of the Secretary. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:22 pm
And, lest we forget our primary purpose, we bend our efforts toward justice (which, according to BLT is not necessarily available to card-carrying members of the ACLU). [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
RETAIL CONSIGNEES FOR FSIS RECALL 034-2009 (EXPANDED) FSIS has reason to believe that the following retail location(s) received assorted beef products that have been recalled by JBS Swift Beef Company. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Allen and conversation with Thomas Wright. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Other speakers include Carnegie expert Salman Ahmed and Thomas Wright of Brookings. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
With respect to both Section 8(a)(3) allegations, the Board assumed that the General Counsel had carried its initial Wright-Line burdens and that it was necessary for the Respondent to establish that it would have taken those disciplinary actions irrespective of unlawful considerations. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
He carried out his plans over the next 35 years, representing mostly companies and trade associations as they navigated the changing legal landscape for PACs, lobbying, ethics, and gift rules. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
Wright. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:23 pm
A similar approach (with different outcome) has been taken in Ribeiro v Wright, 2020 ONSC 1829, Court of Ontario, Canada. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
It was bad enough this week when General Convention decided to open all positions in the Church -- clergy, lay and volunteer -- to all those for whom their sex (gender) is like their apparel, i.e., chosen to fit the mood and the occasion. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Public universities all over the country are grappling with the challenges that arise when members of the university community (especially so-called Registered Student Organizations or RSOs) invite contentious speakers to campus for events that threaten to generate tremendous passion on all sides of controversial issues, and that carry with them the realistic prospect of violence. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Here the Court echoed and solidified Near by saying that a judicial injunction against specific speech “carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the enforcement of such a restraint,” a burden not met in the case before it.The rule against judicial prior restraints is to some extent curious. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Wright, Thompson Hine LLP, Cleveland, for Appellant Ford Motor Company Robert W. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
December 18, 2015 / 64(49);1359-62 Julie R. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In our last column, we explored some threshold justiciability issues (focusing on the plaintiff’s standing to sue in federal court) in the recent federal lawsuit by a Texas-based nonprofit organization—Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences (FASORP)—against Harvard Law Review (HLR), challenging HLR’s use of race and gender in selecting members and also in selecting authors for publication. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
This provision was included, according to the text of the bill itself, “to ensure that this [law] is carried out in a manner that shall not vary the compensation of Senators or Representatives in violation of the twenty-seventh” amendment. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
What is more, at least one lower court case (from the Second Circuit) decided shortly after Printz has rejected a similar challenge to section 1373, holding that although the federal government may not compel states and localities to carry out federal programs, it may prohibit them from restricting state and local officials from “voluntarily” exchanging information with federal authorities. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
It held that there had been no valid service on the defendant because the address used was not the defendant’s representative in the UK, it was merely an office in London from which the defendant did not carry out business. [read post]
