Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 641 - 660 of 4,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:17 am by Walter Olson
Chamber issue list] “Businesses Fear Lawsuits from Sick Employees, Patrons After Reopening” [Erik Larson, Edvard Pettersson and Christopher Yasiejko, Bloomberg] “Frivolous Litigators Bite the Hands That Care for Them” [Veronique de Rugy] “States pass lawsuit-protection measures as Pennsylvania resists” [Nicholas Malfitano, Legal Newsline] Retroactive workers’ comp coverage for the virus by state decree? [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:20 am by Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman
So far, the most interesting and puzzling aspect of Town of Greece v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:57 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Finally, Section V identifies some best practices and evaluates response strategies. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Chamber of Commerce amicus brief in the case): National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:27 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
Today, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in the matter of Duran v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:54 am by Frank Cranmer
Comment The promotion of “living together”/”vivre ensemble” has been advanced in previous cases before the Court, most notably in SAS v France [2014] ECHR 695 [Nussberger and Jäderblom JJ dissenting] in which the Grand Chamber invoked it in support of its conclusion that France’s ban on the burqa was not a violation of Article 9. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The conservative members of the Supreme Court edged closer to eliminating the separation of church and state in the Court’s recent decision American Legion v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:13 am by Amy Howe
At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the amicus brief filed by the State and Local Legal Center in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by INFORRM
  Discusses the “populist wave directed at the European Court of Human Rights and European judges generally” resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in R (F and FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 [read post]