Search for: "Clements v. Clements"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Beiswenger v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 am
Late yesterday Jones awarded Windsor $353,053 plus interest and costs and denied the advisory group’s motion to dismiss in Windsor v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
A recent case, Dickerson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:24 pm
In early 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear Clements (Litigation Guardian of) v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:12 am
The congressional Legal Advisory Group defending DOMA, headed by Paul Clement, has the option of seeking en banc review or heading straight to the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Paul Clement leads all advocates in private practice with nine appearances, including appearances in cases such as Perry v. [read post]
LXBN This Week Ep. 3: Facebook’s IPO, Oracle v. Google, POM’s “Juice Wars” and U.S. v. Roger Clemens
29 May 2012, 4:26 pm
POM Wonderful v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:41 am
Martinez; FCC v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:45 am
Since Marbury v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:40 am
Clemente v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:19 pm
Container, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:04 pm
Supreme Court to rethink its Citizens United v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:39 am
– in New York v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:32 am
Paul Clement for the petitioner! [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:49 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:35 am
At the Daily Beast, Chris Geidner discusses Paul Clement’s position on federalism in some of his current cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:33 am
Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
