Search for: "Close v. U. S"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
Miami Beach v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 3:15 pm
Chilton’s Form U-5 filing was false and should be changed to termination without cause. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:38 am
In Hobbick v Zegans 2018 NY Slip Op 32180(U) September 5, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 159172/2017 Judge: Barbara Jaffe the answer is no. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am
They also argued that the complaint’s allegations of oppressive conduct by the siblings, while relevant under the statute governing judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, have no application under § 702 as per cases such as Doyle v Icon and Matter of Kassab. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 3:00 pm
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia issued an order, in CREW v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:33 am
Instead, courts should look closely at “[t]he facts and circumstances of each case. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
China may well become Europe's greatest pupil. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
REV. 991 (2018); U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-12 Excerpt: Parts I, II, IV and V[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Chemical Foundation, 272 U. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Chemical Foundation, 272 U. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm
“The Court may consider the company’s past performance as well as future events that are ‘known or susceptible of proof’ as of the valuation date” (Ferolito v AriZona Beverages USA LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 32830(U) [Sup Ct, Nassau County Oct. 14, 2014]). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
In Lozman v City of Riviera Beach, 585 U. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
Trump, Stone v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
See Landrigan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:15 am
And, finally, he or she would keep in mind that the Supreme Court recently affirmed in Bluman v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:29 am
Not according to a recent decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla in Balkind v Nickel, 2018 NY Slip Op 31703(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 16, 2018], in which she dismissed a deadlock dissolution petition filed under Section 1104 of the Business Corporation Law brought by a 49% shareholder, despite his co-equal board and shareholder control. [read post]
