Search for: "Commitment of J F"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
§ 355(j)(5)(B)(iii)(II) does not seem to be in conflict with 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:41 pm
Because we conclude that J's prior sexual conduct was relevant to whether the defendant used force in committing the sexual assault, we do not need to address whether it was relevant to J's credibility, as the defendant argues. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:33 am
Moccia, 681 F.2d 61, 63 (1st Cir. 1982)). [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Raymond F. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Caron, 941 F. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:09 pm
It is even more reprehensible when the offense is committed by a police officer. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:46 am
Vincent, 937 F. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm
(e) Upon recommendation by the principal, superintendent of schools, or by a hearing officer or administrative panel appointed pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 48918, the governing board may order a pupil expelled upon finding that the pupil, at school or at a school activity off of school grounds violated subdivision (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l), or (m) of Section 48900, or Section 48900.2, 48900.3, or 48900.4, and either of the following:(1) That other means of… [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Abdelaziz, ___ F.4th ___, 2023 WL 3335870 (1st Cir. 2023). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
Ct. 1986) (Stamos, J., dissenting) (“Liability is not based on a balancing of probabilities, but on a finding of fact. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Court of Appeals Agreements - Prenuptial - Validity - Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (3) - Court of Appeals Holds That Because Affidavit of Notary Was Insufficient to Raise a Question of Fact Precluding Summary Judgment the Court Did Not Need to “Definitively Resolve the Question of Whether a Cure Is Possible” Where There Is Omission in the Requisite Language of the Certificate of Acknowledgment, Signatures on the Prenuptial Agreement Are Authentic, and No Claims of… [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:21 am
” 293 F.3d at 510. [read post]
New Actions to Reduce Backlogs, Expand Premium Processing, and Provide Relief to Work Permit Holders
11 Apr 2022, 8:15 pm
Expansion of premium processing service to Form I-539 change of status to F-1, F-2, J-1, J-2, M-1, or M-2 NIV status, or change of status to or extension of stay in E-1, E-2, E-3, H-4, L-2, O-3, P-4, R-2 NIV status. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:04 am
Eugene F. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:21 pm
ICE, 643 F.3d 60 (3d Cir. 2011).The IJ and BIA committed reversible error by not allowing Mr. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
” Id at n.198., quoting from Kenneth J. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
Buhman, 947 F. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:50 am
Lalor, 996 F.2d 1578, 1579-80 (4th Cir. 1993). [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:25 am
The case is being handled by Assistant Attorney General Andrew J. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:02 pm
” J. [read post]
