Search for: "Cooper v. California" Results 641 - 660 of 1,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
Three Rivers Electrical Cooperative, Inc., 26 S.W.3d 151, 160 (Mo. 2000); Boyette v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:19 am by John Jascob
California, Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York are all filling gaps created by decreased federal government enforcement in certain areas. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:12 am by Moseley Collins
The court very effectively discusses the proximate causation requirement which Plaintiffs must meet: We find persuasive on this issue the following discretion and standard from Cooper v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm by Peter Margulies
White’s ruling in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting case from a New Jersey family court, decided in August, but just released for publication earlier this month, D.G. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:15 am by Alex Wohl
The Northern District Court of California, which heard Cooper’s case, found as much. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
Likewise, offspring are significant and enriching to groups of animals, especially for species that depend on extensive social contact and cooperation. [read post]