Search for: "DOES 1-116"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Before Justices Lang and Brown[1]. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Before Justices Lang and Brown[1]. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:06 am
” 116 respondents (58%) identified “Ball Park” as the responsible party. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
But does the same apply to an arbitral anti-suit injunction restricting proceedings before a court of another member state? [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:41 am
In the second (116 respondents), participants ranked plagiarism as the primary basis for IP rights more often than other commonly accepted bases.In the third and most complex study (443 respondents), participants reviewed vignettes related to creative products in medicine, electronics, software, books, music, or painting, and answered questions about whether IP does or ought to provide protection in the scenario. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
Bryan, 296 S.C. 305, 372 S.E.2d 116, 119 (Ct.App. 1988). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:58 pm
A scanned copy of the RTI application and the response received from NCRB is at Annexure -1. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm
The Rule does not remove exemptions for any type of water that was previously exempt from the Act. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
The defendant does not have to show that he has taken the minimum necessary, however. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Commonwealth, 60 Va.App. 1, 723 S.E.2d 260 (Virginia Court of Appeals (2012) (quoting Haskins v. [read post]
On Delfi v Estonia… Is it time to adopt a good-Samaritan style exemption? – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm
It does not seem to have been the view of the national courts. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
These elements, said the Appellate Division, constituted “substantial evidence” supporting the Board's decision that the Firm retained sufficient overall control of Lawyers services to establish an employment relationship, despite evidence in the record that could support a contrary conclusion.Significantly, the court commented that “The fact that [Lawyer] signed a written agreement designating him as an independent contractor does not compel a different result,… [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:30 am
These elements, said the Appellate Division, constituted “substantial evidence” supporting the Board's decision that the Firm retained sufficient overall control of Lawyers services to establish an employment relationship, despite evidence in the record that could support a contrary conclusion.Significantly, the court commented that “The fact that [Lawyer] signed a written agreement designating him as an independent contractor does not compel a different result,… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
”[12] So what does the evidence suggest? [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
”The court noted two additional grounds advanced by the Department for denying disclosure of the proposed interrogation questions – the exemption of [1] the disclosure of records that "interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings,” and the exemption of [2] pre-decisional, inter-agency or intra-agency materials from disclosure. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
”The court noted two additional grounds advanced by the Department for denying disclosure of the proposed interrogation questions – the exemption of [1] the disclosure of records that "interfere with law enforcement investigations or judicial proceedings,” and the exemption of [2] pre-decisional, inter-agency or intra-agency materials from disclosure. [read post]
30 May 2015, 4:21 am
” This directive was repealed by Directive 2006/116/EC, of which Recital 16 reprises the same words than Recital 17.The TGI then examined the Jimi Hendrix photograph. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:05 pm
Even though the EACJ does not have explicit human rights jurisdiction, on a number of occasions it has considered cases that involve human rights issues (see Katabazi v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:52 am
”1 What does all this mean? [read post]
7 May 2015, 2:23 pm
Ahead of Section 215’s sunset on June 1, Sen. [read post]
