Search for: "Defenders of Wildlife"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
United States Federal Highway Administration (sacred sites)Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 12:08 pm
The district court initially issued a summary judgment in favor of the defendants. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:16 am
The appeals court’s ruling upholds a lower district court’s decision in a lawsuit brought by the California Attorney General Xavier Becerra and a number of environmental activist groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity, the Sierra Club and the Defenders of Wildlife, who argued that the DHS’s waiver of environmental protection statutes when expediting the construction of the border barriers was illegal. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Kane will have the right to defend himself against these charges. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:22 pm
Department of Wildlife & Fishery, State of Louisiana, Case No. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 2:08 pm
Patrick's Day:Chauvinism rampant and coercing green,To celebrate beer and Gaelic spleen.That merry robed Pat, with uplifted truncheon,He whacked scaly wildlife into extinction.But history forced me to change my view,To realize that I should celebrate too.The Fifth Century was hard for a Romanized Celt,Captured by bandits, into slavery dealt.He labored, cold and hungry, in bondage pastoral,Learning hard lessons how slavery's immoral.Transformed to live a more spiritual way,He… [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:00 am
The following action alerts have been active this year: Protect Whistleblowers and Exposure of Automobile Safety Cover-ups by the Transportation Department; Defend the False Claims Act from Corporate Takeover; Reform the Broken FBI Whistleblower Program; Support the WARN Act for Wall Street Whistleblowers; Establish National Whistleblower Day to Honor Whistleblowers and Celebrate Transparency; Protect Wildlife Crime Whistleblowers; Pass the Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act;… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
In sum, the court held: The expansion of the Frog population, coupled with defendants’ careful attention to moving any vulnerable egg masses and their continuing interactions with [the Fish and Wildlife Service] seeking authorization to do so, make this a situation that does not warrant the temporary, immediate, and drastic relief afforded by a preliminary injunction. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 12:06 am
In the decision, the court denied motions by the defendant City and intervenors to dismiss the case on the grounds that plaintiffs lack standing. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:20 pm
Fish and Wildlife Service might adopt some other statutory construction. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 10:49 am
Leesfield Scolaro filed suit against multiple defendants immediately and secured a settlement on behalf of the family. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:20 pm
Defenders of Wildlife here. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 658 (2007) (noting that arbitrary and capricious standard is "deferential" to the agency). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
Defenders of Wildlife (written by Justice Scalia). [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:38 am
Defendants involved with drugs can be charged with federal or state crimes. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:19 pm
He was not paying attention because he did not expect anything to be there. [25] The accident occurred in an area where there is wildlife. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
Wildlife Trafficking: A Case in Point In her blog of March 3, 2021, Bonnie Wyper lamented that Goal 16 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), while groundbreaking in its acknowledgment of the central role of good governance and rule of law in advancing sustainable development, did not single out specific issues like wildlife trafficking. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 9:21 am
” Days before the deadline, however, the agency’s Fish and Wildlife Service said it needed more time. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:27 am
Plaintiffs National Wildlife Federation and the State of Oregon filed lawsuits challenging the 2008 and 2010 biological opinions. [read post]
