Search for: "Doe 1-5" Results 641 - 660 of 54,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 9:22 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The first line in this editorial adequately summarizes the problem that leads to unsafe drugs and medical devices: What would your reaction be if the results of a football match were reported as 5:0 by one of the teams and as 3:1 by the other team? [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 10:10 am
I've been asked to mention that the ABA Section of International Law is having its 2007 Spring Meeting at the Fairmont Hotel in Washington, DC May 1-5, 2007. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:12 pm
For those interested, Nanotechnology Law & Business just published my new article: "FDA Labeling of Cosmetics Containing Nanoscale Materials," Volume 5, Issue 1.The article abstract follows:  Numerous products are regulated by the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:17 am by Employment Services
In this case, the claimant obtained work, but did not present sufficient evidence of an ongoing job search as required by OAC 4125-1-01(C)(5). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:21 am
On appeal, the Board affirmed the examiner's anticipation rejections of claims 1-5 and 8-10. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
After 29 "Whereas" clauses, the Resolution reads:That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—(1) the slogan, “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”, is outrightly antisemitic and must be strongly condemned; (2) this slogan is divisive and does a disservice to Israelis, Palestinians, and all those in the region who seek peace;(3) this slogan rejects calls for peace, stability, and safety in the region;(4) this slogan… [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:13 am by Docket Navigator
Praxair Distribution, Inc. et al, 1-15-cv-00170 (DED September 5, 2017, Order) (Sleet, USDJ) [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:01 am
Please join us on Thursday, December 5, 2013 (12:00 - 1:15p.m. central time) for "Conquering the FMLA Medical Certification Process: Best Practices for Employers." [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:15 am by Gene Quinn
The issues I will be watching in 2018 other than Oil States are as follows: (1) What does the new Director of the USPTO do with respect to reforming the PTAB? [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 8:25 pm by Patent Docs
Strafford will be offering a webinar entitled "Post-Sale Restrictions: Protecting Patented Products After Lexmark" on July 5, 2018 from 1:00 to 2:30 pm (EDT). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:30 am by EEM
Global Asylum Trends 2012: How Does Australia Compare? [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Jim Walker
  Plus Carnival does not pay for the services provided by the U.S. federal agencies such as the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 1:34 pm
Examples abound, with two in a row last week, here (pp. 5-6) and here (p. 3, fn.1).Also of note from last week, this 9th Cir. opinion here about anti-SLAPP appealability.And see The Great Reshaping: How Trump is Changing the Game on Judicial Nominations: With 148 judicial vacancies as of Jan. 2 and an increasingly aging federal bench, President Donald Trump could remake the federal judiciary on a scale that hasn’t been possible in decades. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Here is just the summary list of the seven deadly sins: 1) Using POLST with people who are too healthy. 2) Signing a POLST form without meaningful discussion. 3) Having patients complete their own POLST form. 4) Providing incentives for completing more POLST forms. 5) Failing to review POLST forms. 6) Letting POLST disappear. 7) Failing to evaluate your use of the POLST Paradigm. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:28 am
Whilst any increase will be welcome to the trade and event organisers, the extra 3 offers only a small benefit, and it should not be forgotten that there was no change to the other limits, so anyone who holds a personal licence is still subject to a maximum of 50 in a calendar year wherever the event will be held, and anyone who applies who does not hold a personal licence is limited to just 5 per calendar year. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 8:57 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- finding that: (1) USCIS failed to show that it performed adequate search for records relating to government’s so-called ‘Zero-Tolerance Policy for Criminal Illegal Entry”; (2) plaintiffs did not muster enough evidence to show that USCIS has pattern or practice of violating FOIA, but stating that court “suspects that USCIS does, in fact” have one; (3) agency properly relied on Exemption 5’s deliberative process privilege to withhold… [read post]