Search for: "Does 1-13"
Results 641 - 660
of 21,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
The appellant points correctly to page 9, lines 10 to 13, in support.Hence, the Board does not share the view of the Examining Division that the cited passage on page 9 merely describes "the process of narrowing down a set of already present candidate views" and that the "origin of this initial set of candidate views ... remains undefined". [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Petitioner's primary contention on appeal was that Charge 1 should have been dismissed as untimely. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Petitioner's primary contention on appeal was that Charge 1 should have been dismissed as untimely. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 7:43 am
They are as follows: 1. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 10:09 am
Wilson on 8/13/2007. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:22 pm
So what does this mean in practice? [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 11:58 am
The Supreme Court (8-1) in a January 13 decision confirmed that the “Mobile-Sierra presumption” that rates and terms of a wholesale power or natural gas contract are presumed to be just and reasonable applies as against all challenges and challengers, including non-parties to the contract, so long as the contract was freely negotiated at arm’s length. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 6:14 am
Plaintiff worked for the company for 13 years. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:35 pm
Cir. 2007); link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/13-1476.Opinion.6-10-2014.1.PDF [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In Jane Does 1-6 v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:12 am
Similarly, on page 103, Nitta teaches a separate power source SP for delivery of power to the wire feeder.For these reasons, we do not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claim 12 and claims 13-17 which depend therefrom.As a footnote to the case, note the point about provisional double-patenting rejections: Claim 1 of copending Application No. 11/609,871 was amended on July 2, 2010, after the Examiner’s rejection that is the subject of this appeal (see Office Action… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:13 am
" Applicant asserted that "SENSING" does not describe its product because it does not have a sensor; instead, it detects disruptions in the flow of energy waves emitted by the preexisting IoT devices in the area.]In re Superior Balance S.L., Application Serial No. 88632909 (January 13, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:22 am
However, about 18 petitions filed between 1999 and 2011 remained pending for a period ranging from 1 year to 13 years." [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
The People, who posted a report on Friday June 13, 2014, "Second Circuit OKs Scanning Whole Books. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:19 pm
Thus, the legislative history of the statute clearly does not support such an application of this law to this conduct. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:19 pm
Thus, the legislative history of the statute clearly does not support such an application of this law to this conduct. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
An "order of relief" and "automatic stay" is issued by the court when a chapter 7 case is filed, this does not apply to chapter 13 filings. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 6:31 am
” So does this mean that a otherwise qualified exempt organization (e.g., a hospital) can engage in school activities alongside its other exempt functions and qualify for these benefits? [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
The pertinent parts are:1. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:55 am
Previously capped off at $75,000, $100,000 or $175,000 the homestead exemption will increase as of January 1, 2021. [read post]
