Search for: "Early v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 16,782
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Quite often, the biggest obstacle to early resolution in such cases is costs….one of the ways in which this court can achieve this aim is to take account of reasonable admissible offers made to settle a case at an early stage of proceedings in determining what costs should be paid, if an action is pressed to trial in the face of such offers. [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:26 am
CLS Bank v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Francis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:33 am
(Eugene Volokh) A commenter on the thread about the 1901 case in which the court rejected (on statutory grounds) a prosecution for expelling someone from church based on how he voted writes: It goes almost without saying that religious freedom was not at issue in this case because the First Amendment would not be incorporated against the states until Gitlow v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:23 am
In the Arizona Supreme Court's Vazquez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
In Smiley v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:46 am
As Justice Brandeis noted, in his famous dissent in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
Within a few years, the issue had produced a constitutional crisis, famously acted out in the Supreme Court’s determination that states were subject to suit, Chisholm v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Jack Rakove Back in the early 1970s, when my old friend Alex Keyssar and I were Harvard graduate students, we were part of an occasional “politics table” at Leverett House featuring John Rawls and Judith Shklar. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 7:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:18 am
In early September, Judge Jeffrey S. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 6:00 am
I have been referred, helpfully, to a number of Canadian and United States of America cases touching on the matters under review: cases such as Loper v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
Lorenzo v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
New York State’s Human Rights Law does not protect an employee from all retaliation, only from retaliation that results in an injury or harmNapierala v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2016 NY Slip Op 04832, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentLisa Napierala challenged New York State Division of Human Rights’ [SDHR] determination of "no probable cause" with respect to her complaint that Erie Community College [ECC] had retaliated against… [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:19 am
That schedule ended in early September 2016. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 11:38 pm
The issue in FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 22 was, ultimately, a narrow one. [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 5:29 pm
SEC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
