Search for: "FEDERER v. DAVIS"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,419
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, and whether the First Amendment and the Supreme Court’s decision in NAACP v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:45 am
Briefly: At The Oklahoman (via How Appealing), Chris Casteel reports that in a brief filed last week in McGirt v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:07 am
Davis 19-569Issues: (1) Whether “prevailing professional norms” required counsel in a capital case to investigate potential mitigation evidence, including red flags for mental health and substance abuse, before the Supreme Court decided Wiggins v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:07 am
v=NH-VuP_5cA4. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:30 pm
The plaintiffs are represented by EFF, Davis, Wright Tremaine LLP, Walters Law Group, and Daphne Keller. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:56 am
Judges Davis and Ho were not a part of the panel. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
Not surprisingly, given the absence of any non-litigation experts endorsing the causal conclusion, the defendants challenged plaintiffs’ proffered expert witnesses under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
James School v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:31 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
Davis and capital resentencing case McKinney v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
Davis, 2019 Pa. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 9:04 am
And more recently, in Paul v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:13 am
Relying on Davis v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
.ʺ Davis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
This might explain some of what the Supreme Court said and did in the 1993 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Christopher Novus Davis v. [read post]
