Search for: "FOX v. UNITED STATES"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am
Times previews Holder v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
Background to the Story On October 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia determined that NAGPRA does not apply to the requested repatriation of Jim Thorpe’s remains. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
The United States actually had a society for the prevention of cruelty to animals before it had one for children, so this is no mean feat! [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Newsom v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
Fox and Bruce S. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:09 am
Of the significance in that regard is the New Jersey case which made national headlines in 2011, Innes v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 8:00 am
United States, 2020 WL 7692766 (W.D.N.Y.). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 11:12 am
In addition to the state and federal courts of D.C., VA, and M.D., he is a member of the Federal Courts in Puerto Rico, Colorado, and Texas, as well as the Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, where he has recently argued and won three appellate matters, the Veteran’s Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court, where he was lead counsel on a False Claims Act case (See United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
They have been “playing” the United States for years. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 10:13 am
This was a public appearance in his capacity as President of the United States, after all. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:10 am
Neff is a partner with the law firm of Fox Rothschild LLP. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:36 am
He said the United States did not use "brute force" and the memos prove detainees weren't tortured. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm
Instead, we are talking about a religious test.By the way, that is unconstitutional:“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant of impeding the administration of the tax code, the government must prove that the defendant knew of or could have foreseen a tax-related proceeding. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
Chief Justice John Marshall famously stated "[t]he government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
